Why waiting for progress at IMO is a very risky strategy
The current industry focus on securing carbon pricing and a 2050 zero emissions target from the IMO is the wrong priority — we should be looking at what happens between now and 2030
COP27 may have tipped the balance inside the IMO courtesy of its ‘loss and damage’ agreement, but the question of funding poorer countries for the energy transition is only part of the policy problem that still needs to be unlocked by the IMO’s forthcoming revision of its climate strategy