Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: More than coincidence

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

WHERE there’s blame, there’s a claim, or so they tell us on those nuisance marketing calls from personal injury lawyers. It’s just that nobody yet knows who is to blame for the explosion on Greece-owned aframax Seajewel (IMO: 9388807last Saturday.

The incident is one of at least four reports in recent months of suspicious blasts on tankers that have called at Russian ports in the last year or so.

Although the signs so far all point that way, the latest such occurrence is not yet confirmed as terrorism or sabotage. It may just have been down to something far more commonplace, such as machinery failure.

But most commentators are leaning towards the inescapable conclusion that these things are now happening too often to be the outcome of the random workings of chance.

Somebody appears to have something of an animus against shipping’s involvement in this trade.

The Ukrainian government obviously falls into this category and is known to have carried out extrajudicial and extraterritorial operations against Russian targets, including the assassination of senior military personnel.

Alternatively, a third party may be freelancing in support of the Ukrainian cause. Then again, Seajewel was alongside in Savona at the time, so the involvement of Italian organised crime cannot be precluded either.

As we report, marine underwriters detect what one referred to as “a pattern of deliberate action”.

Our working assumption is that Seajewel will have had hull war risk insurance, if only on the grounds that vessels trading with Russia would be daft not to.

So, the likelihood is that a marine insurer will be on the hook for the repair bill, although we do not know which one, or even in which market the cover was placed.

Nevertheless, lawyers are clear that black operations — if that’s what this was — do give owners a legitimate claim under such policies.

The good news for everybody else is that insurers see the threat to date as confined to a relatively small number of ships and there is little chance that war risk premiums will rise all round in consequence.

Meanwhile, marine insurance will stay in sharp focus for the rest of this week and most of next.

Noon tomorrow marks the hard deadline for the signing of International Group P&I policies, which cover 85% or so of the world fleet by tonnage.

David Osler
Insurance editor, Lloyd’s List

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Vessels
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1152639

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel