Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: What happens next time?

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

“MASSIVE fireballs” emanating from burning ships laden with US military-owned jet fuel and (thankfully empty) sodium cyanide containers understandably make politicians, and everyone else, nervous. More so when they happen within striking distance of TV cameras.

We don’t yet know what caused a Madeira-flagged boxship to hit a US-flagged tanker anchored off the UK coast early on Monday.

We don’t yet know how serious the pollution implications of this casualty will be, or what the final clean up, salvage and legal costs will look like.

We do, however, know that it could have been a lot worse.

The first sigh of relief came when it was confirmed that all but one of the crew were safe and accounted for. The second came once politicians were told that it wasn’t linked to Russia.

However bad this casualty looks to a general public watching live footage of two ships on fire, there will ultimately be answers from a thorough accident investigation process.

The emergency response was rapid and textbook. The owners, flag state authorities, insurers and everyone else associated with these two ships are all known and are already co-operating.

The wheels are in motion to deal with what comes next and there are established protocols, systems and agencies in place to make that happen.

Should this have been the big “dark fleet” incident that everybody has been predicting is both imminent and inevitable, this would be a very different story.

While the initial emergency response would unlikely have been affected, the question of how to deal with uninsured, sanctioned, or otherwise politically toxic ships is still not yet clear.

The best guess is that the best scenario would be a more difficult response as all parts of the system slow down to assess what is and is not going to be acceptable or land them in hot water. Beyond the emergency response there would likely be a very politicised and drawn out process.

While the overwhelming fear of an uninsured catastrophe off Europe’s coast has been widely predicted for some time, the inconvenient truth is that most governments are still not ready to deal with it when it happens.

The priority is to deal with the situation in front us and work out how a ship running at 16 knots can hit an anchored tanker.

The next question should be what happens next time.

At the very least this unfortunate casualty should concentrate minds in governments that now is the time to have a clear plan ready to go to deal with a shadow fleet equivalent of this incident.

Richard Meade
Editor-in-chief, Lloyd’s List

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1152827

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel