Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US port fees: A shipbuilding game changer or a shot in the foot?

Listen to the latest edition of the Lloyd’s List weekly podcast — your free weekly briefing on the stories shaping shipping
 

Proposed US port fees targeting China-built ships could significantly reshape the global shipbuilding landscape. But if history is any guide, overly aggressive policies often backfire — potentially leaving the US shipbuilding revival effort as yet another case of shooting itself in the foot

 

 

IF CHINESE shipyards are feeling uneasy right now, it’s perfectly understandable. Last month, in an effort to revive its nearly non-existent domestic shipbuilding industry, the United States Trade Representative’s office unleashed its most potent tax weapon yet against Chinese ships.

The US plans to levy exorbitant port fees — in some cases, over a million dollars — for every US port call by Chinese operators, China-built ships, all operators that have any ships on order at Chinese yards, and according to one interpretation of the proposal, based on a presidential draft order obtained by Lloyd’s List, all operators with any China-built ships in their fleets.

If the goal is to revive the US commercial shipbuilding sector, these port fees may have a very limited impact, at least in the short term. Historically, overly aggressive reforms often fail due to a lack of execution or a systemic collapse caused by excessive shock. However, if the aim is to undermine China’s dominance in the global shipbuilding industry, the effects may become apparent much more quickly.

Brokers have already reported that China-built ships are losing their appeal in the long-term charter market, simply because of the possibility they may not be able to visit the US in the future. This also highlights the problem faced by China-built ships isn’t as simple as avoiding the US market and turning to other destinations.

Losing the ability to go to the US means that these ships, especially those used for tramp trade, have reduced applicability in the charter market, which will inevitably be reflected in their charter rates. And if charter rates are discounted relative to more widely applicable Japan- and South Korea-built vessels, that discount will also inevitably be passed on to the value of newbuildings.

In a nutshell, the products of Chinese shipyards will depreciate due to a loss of competitiveness. And the worst-case scenario is that they will have to give up at least some of their market share to their foreign competitors. It’s fair to say that those from South Korea and Japan, the world’s second- and third-largest shipbuilding nations respectively, are probably eagerly awaiting this opportunity.

The US port fees could be a “game changer” in reshaping market dynamics for the global shipbuilding industry.

This week's edition of the podcast features: 

  • SM Kim, executive director of Korea Equity Research, JP Morgan

  • Dimitris Roumeliotis, head of research, Xclusiv Shipbrokers

  • Rob Willmington, markets editor, Lloyd’s List

 

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1152880

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel