Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Carbon taxes set to reshape shipping

The surging cost of carbon compliance will ripple through supply chains, driving up freight rates, influencing fuel choices, and potentially reshaping global trade patterns

Carbon pricing has moved from a regulatory abstraction to an immediate financial reality. With total costs surging towards $50bn by the end of the decade, industry players must adapt — or risk being priced out of compliance

CARBON pricing is no longer a distant regulatory threat — it’s already impacting shipping and trading.

The European Union is leading the charge, with the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) and FuelEU Maritime adding an estimated $6.1bn to industry costs in 2025 alone.

The IMO’s Greenhouse Gas Fuel Intensity (GFI) measure is set to join the mix from 2028, driving up costs even further.

Whether the EU — and other regulators — will treat the GFI as a sufficient global price signal remains an open question. If not, shipowners and charterers could be staring down a combined carbon bill approaching $50bn by 2030 in a business-as-usual scenario.

Crunching the numbers using a typical vessel burning heavy fuel oil as a baseline, it is clear these new regulations will carry significant financial consequences — particularly for those unprepared.

Take the Santos-Rotterdam grain route for a panamax class ship as an example: the projected increase in these costs is stark.

In 2024, carbon costs were relatively small, at around $47,000 for a newly built — and therefore more efficient and lower-emitting — ship on a round voyage limited to only EUA costs at the 2024 phase-in coverage rate of 40%.

By 2028, the inclusion of FuelEU Maritime and GFI costs will push the total carbon cost to almost $380,000, nearly a 10-fold increase.

By 2030, the cumulative cost of EUA ($250,000), FuelEU ($80,000) and GFI ($200,000) tops $530,000 — if the expected EUA price is taken into account — posing significant financial pressure on cargo owners and charterers.

Long-haul dirty tanker routes such as Mongstad-Singapore on a very large crude carrier bear some of the highest absolute costs.

Starting from just over $165,000 in 2024, the combined cost balloons to more than $1.9m by 2030, with the GFI component alone adding in excess of half a million dollars.

This sharp rise could have a chilling effect on certain trade flows or force shifts to more carbon-efficient tonnage.

While the headline figure is substantial, the cost per tonne of cargo highlights the broader challenge. This equates to more than $7 per tonne of cargo — enough to erase all but the most resilient arbitrage opportunities — and, as a result, the economics of long-haul trades could be fundamentally altered.

 

 

These surging costs will ripple through supply chains, driving up freight rates, influencing fuel choices, and potentially reshaping global trade patterns.

Older, less-efficient vessels may struggle with viability under escalating carbon costs, but owners are turning to commercial decarbonisation strategies — accepting discounted freight contracts in exchange for greater operational flexibility.

Controlled speed, reduced ballast legs, and optimised routing can aid ship compliance.

However, this shift highlights a broader trend: in a more regulated market, agility and smart partnerships may allow smaller players to outpace larger, slower-moving competitors.

This has long been thought in the market and is clearly evidenced by the uptick in dual-fuel newbuildings on order, but the question remains over fuel availability and cost.

 

 

While zero and near-zero (ZNZ) fuels offer the promise of compliance with minimal emissions exposure, their higher price may still outweigh the penalties of non-compliance. Shippers and charterers alike will need to adapt quickly — or risk being priced out of the carbon-compliant market.

As regulations tighten and environmental costs climb, carbon pricing is no longer a peripheral concern — it is central to the economics of global shipping.

Despite the scale of these projected costs, the market has yet to surrender EUAs for 2024.

This delay risks masking the true financial impact — amplifying the divide between those with proactive compliance strategies and those without.

George Griffiths, Geir Olafsen and Bernhard Feet work for maritime emissions analytics company Siglar Carbon

Join Lloyd's List Intelligence and Siglar Carbon at our Commercial Decarbonisation Get-Together 2025 event at Nor-Shipping on June 3, also featuring LSEG and Flex LNG. For more information and to register your interest in attending, follow this link

 

This article is part of Lloyd’s List’s Half-Year Outlook 2025, which can be viewed here. A print edition will be distributed at Nor-Shipping in Oslo.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1153462

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel