Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Zim strikes cautious tone, citing uncertainty on rebound duration

  • China-US volumes have surged; Zim ships will soon sail full and they may not be able to accommodate all booking requests
  • Zim has 70% of its transpacific volumes in the spot market, giving it very high exposure to rising rates amid the rebound
  • Zim executives caution the demand rebound could be short lived, and that trade war could still play out negatively for second-half results

The coast is far from clear for liner operators like Zim. Volumes are currently surging but more trade-war fallout could be around the corner, depending how US negotiations go with China and other Asian exporters

THE FIRST quarter might as well be ancient history for businesses such as container shipping and US retail.

The market landscape has changed dramatically since then, not once but twice — with the US President Donald Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs, then the temporary pullback in those tariffs.

Israeli container shipping line Zim said on Monday it earned $296m in net income in 1Q25, compared with $92m in 1Q24. Earnings of $2.45 per share were far above the consensus forecast for $1.87 per share.

Zim’s average freight rate came in at $3,552 per feu, down 6% sequentially versus the fourth quarter of last year.

 

 

More importantly to investors, Zim executives gave their views on the current landscape, and how Trump’s tariffs are impacting container shipping rates and demand.

Very high spot exposure for transpacific business

Trump’s decision to roll back incremental tariffs on China from 145% to 30% led to a sharp rebound on Wall Street, but the coast is definitely not yet clear.

In an interview with Lloyd’s List, Zim chief financial officer Xavier Destriau said that after the initial 145% tariff announcement, “we experienced a drop in export cargo out of China to the tune of 50%”.

Following last week’s decision to bring those tariffs down, “booking requests have been extremely strong”, Destriau said. “We may even not be in a position to honour all of the requests that we are getting when we look at what is happening right now. I think our vessels will be sailing full very soon.”

Zim is in a particularly good position to take advantage of rate upside, because it has higher spot rate exposure on the transpacific than other liner companies.

The company’s transpacific business was 35% contract, 65% spot in 2024. For contracts starting this year on May 1, its spot exposure is even higher, at 70%.

Three months ago, Zim was targeting a 50-50 mix. But shipper uncertainty due to Trump’s tariffs tipped the balance toward spot. “We had a minimum [contract] rate we were not willing to compromise on, and some of our customers were more in ‘wait and see’ mode,” said Destriau on the conference call with analysts.

“Clearly, a surge in spot rates will benefit us as long as it lasts,” he told Lloyd’s List. The caveat, he said, was that “rates can go up meaningfully for a short period of time, but maybe this will not last for long”.

Tariff deadlines loom in the months ahead

The big dates to watch, he said, were July 9, the end of the pause for non-China reciprocal tariffs, and August 14, the end of the pause for reciprocal tariffs on China.

“Those key dates are still ahead of us, and the outcome will have a significant potential effect on the financial performance of the company in the second half. It is still very much of an unknown.”

Around 65%-70% of Zim’s transpacific business is China-US, with the remainder out of other Asian countries. Since the initial pause in non-China reciprocal tariffs, that non-China Asian business has increased as shippers have frontloaded.

“That did offset, to some extent, the cargo drop out of China, but as we get closer to July 9, we will probably see a drop in exports from Southeast Asian countries,” said Destriau.

Zim maintained its full-year guidance for adjusted before earnings before interest and taxes of $350m-$950m. Given 1Q25 adjusted ebit of $463m, that implies an aggregate result in the final three quarters of -$113m to $487m.

Despite all the exuberance over the US-China trade war détente, Zim’s outlook remains conservative. It still believes results in the second half will be worse than in the first, and that average rates in the final three quarters will be below average rates in 1Q25.

“The volume situation, for us, is the greatest variable,” explained Destriau. “Volume is the key unknown in terms of guidance.”

As Zim chief executive Eli Glickman said during the conference call, the US-China tariff reprieve was “positive,” however, “it remains too early to determine whether the surge in demand we have seen in the last few days represents a return to normalised US-China volumes”.

 

 

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1153509

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel