Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Green coalition urges IMO states to vote yes as unity on NZF strains

  • Green tech progress is being made, but no real green demand without regulation
  • IMO secretary-general Arsenio Dominguez said the organisation was still on track to meet its regulation timeline
  • Shipping highly unlikely to reach 5% zero-carbon fuels by 2030

The Global Maritime Forum has urged states to keep their resolve and negotiate to fix problems with its landmark Net-Zero Framework as industry criticism grows

THE Global Maritime Forum has urged the International Maritime Organization to adopt the Net-Zero Framework, as its latest progress report shows the industry is far off track to reach 5% green fuels by 2030.

Its Getting to Zero Coalition, a group of 180 green-minded companies, said member states should adopt the carbon pricing scheme next month, then fix its problems in the years to 2028.

“A failure to do so risks significantly negative consequences for the shipping industry,” the group said in a statement.

“While transforming the sector will be challenging, doing so via regulation by the IMO is the best way to ensure that this happens fairly, efficiently and globally.”

The statement follows criticism of the NZF from the US and Middle Eastern oil exporters, and warnings by class societies DNV and ABS that the green rules would be too costly for shipping companies.

Maersk, the US Chamber of Shipping and the World Shipping Council have spoken in favour of the framework, while Shell Marine has warned there was “no Plan B” if it failed.

The GMF said it was crucial that constructive talks continued and negotiators agreed on guidelines for delivering the 2023 strategy.

“The foundation for success is there if the political will to adopt the framework in October and refine it over time remains firm,” the group said.

“Prolonged uncertainty could put very large investments — ones that will be critical for the future of global trade — at risk.”

 

 

 

The GMF’s latest progress report said the industry was well off track to meet its unofficial target of 5% scalable zero-emission fuel (SZEF, meaning green e-fuels and excluding liquefied natural gas) uptake by 2030.

The GMF set the target in 2021 as a way to show how focused efforts could snowball toward broader adoption. It argued this was crucial to meeting the IMO’s 2023 greenhouse gas strategy goals.

But the group’s latest progress report found green fuel demand and finance were not on track, despite some progress on the technology and training for seafarers.

UCL senior research fellow Domagoj Baresic said the green transition was “partially on track” overall.

Baresic said the direction of travel was more important than the year the fuel milestone was reached, which he suggested could be in the early 2030s.

The real risk was not failing to hit 5% by 2030, but “losing sight of the breakthrough altogether”.

Baresic said progress depended on how the IMO decided to classify the lifecycle assessment guidelines and rewards for zero-carbon fuels.

“In order for us to be fully on track, we need to see what happens next,” Baresic said.

Reaching 5% SZEF by 2030 would entail coming up with 0.6 exajoules of green power — about enough to run 600 15,000 teu boxships.

Virtually none exists for shipping today — and the NZF, if adopted, would only start taxing ships for a small amount of their emissions in 2028.

IMO secretary-general Arsenio Dominguez said the IMO was working to its diplomatic schedule.

“This is a marathon, but we are on track in this process,” he said.

“We’re going step by step. We’re not running towards the end goal just yet.”

Dominguez said the IMO was considering the lifecycle emissions of different fuels, including LNG and nuclear, because it had agreed to be fuel and technology-agnostic.

He said the green transition was neither free nor without challenges.

But Dominguez added: “It’s 2025. The amendments will be adopted next month, enter into force 2027. And from then onwards, of course, things will scale up.”

GMF chief executive Johanna Christensen said the industry had moved from ideas and concepts in 2017 to real progress on technology such as dual-fuel ships today.

“At this moment, they’re pockets of change,” she said. “They’re not system-wide.”

Christensen said the progress report represented a static snapshot, but the broader goal was more complex. Investments by single companies could make it easier for other parts of the supply to progress in their own goals.

“It’s a dynamic interaction between different parties and different players taking steps together,”  she said. 

The NZF will probably go up for a vote by the IMO’s 176 member states at the Marine Environment Protection Committee’s extraordinary session, which starts on October 13.

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1154834

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel