Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Disrupting Cape of Good Hope route ‘wouldn’t be that hard’

Shipping’s safe route around the southern tip of Africa could be disrupted with very little technology, James Henry Bergeron said

The past four years has seen a ‘paradigm shift’ in maritime security, Nato adviser tells industry

THE one “guaranteed” remaining safe route between Asia and Europe could be disrupted with relative ease, James Henry Bergeron, political adviser to the Commander of Nato Allied Command, has warned.

Shipping shifted from the Red Sea shortcut around the Cape of Good Hope in the wake of Houthi attacks in late 2023. As of September 2025, traffic through the Bab el Mandeb chokepoint remains far below levels seen before the Iran-backed rebel group hijacked Galaxy Leader (IMO: 9237307), despite a recent spike in transits last month.

Sky News economics editor Ed Conway told the London International Shipping Week headline conference that he was “struck” by how little significant disruption there had been to world trade despite the rerouting, and paid homage to the shipping industry’s resilience.

But Bergeron was graver in his outlook. Disrupting that safe route “wouldn’t be that hard”, he said. He said the impact Somali pirates had with “zero technology” was evidence of this and said his organisation was watching the situation.

Any disruption to the round-Africa route would bring a “massive dislocation of trade”, he added.

Maritime security had undergone a “paradigm shift” in the past four years. Nato’s focus in the post-Cold War era was centred on the threat from non-state actors and enforcing arms embargoes on those that did not comply with the rules-based international order.

While some indicators of change were visible, including limpet mines used by Iranian forces, the shift came with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine which saw shipping and port infrastructure “directly targeted”.

The change had been from “exquisite, expensive technology in the hands of a few rich countries” to newer tech that can be placed in the hands of “just about anyone who wants it”.

 

 

 

First Sea Lord and head of the Royal Navy, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, told the conference that the Royal Navy’s role in protecting sea lanes, protecting underwater infrastructure and deterring aggression had “never been more vital”.

He called the force’s presence in geopolitical hotspots not just a show of strength, but “a demonstration of our unwavering commitment to the free flow of trade and the security of the global commerce”.

Jenkins said the UK believed in “the importance of rules that benefit all”, and insisted that militaries must protect the rules-based order “not just through presence, but through partnership”.

But Bergeron warned that Nato members were suffering from a lack of resources.

The bloc had a “sharp focus on defending every inch of allied territory” on land, sea and air.

But he admitted there “aren’t enough hulls anymore for the challenges we face” and said just like commercial shipping, Nato forces had a “recruitment and retention problem”.

Bergeron’s comments are evidenced by recent events in the Red Sea, including the loss of Eternity C (IMO: 9588249), which saw several seafarers left in the water for a lengthy period of time, before some were rescued and others picked up by Houthi forces.

A warship of Eunavfor’s Operation Aspides was engaged in a handover ceremony and could not respond to the incident, and Lloyd’s List understands that vessels of other navies in the region were also unable or unwilling to intervene.

“We need to improve, across the alliance, the number and calibre of our sailors,” Bergeron added.

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Vessels
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1154844

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel