Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: On manoeuvres

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

THE illustrious history of the Royal Navy can be traced back to one simple mission statement: protect British interests at sea and keep trade lanes open across the globe.

Of course in centuries gone by, that meant protecting tea clippers and spice ships as they journeyed from colonies to British ports with their expensive cargo. The threat landscape today is rather different.

And so too are the players. Britain is not the only naval force on the water protecting merchant shipping now. It’s joined by the European Naval Force and the US, among others.

The mission statement, though, is broadly the same: protect shipping and uphold freedom of navigation.

It’s a mission the First Sea Lord and head of the Royal Navy, Sir Gwyn Jenkins, reiterated at the headline conference of London International Shipping Week today. His navy, he said, remained “steadfast in its commitment” to defending the rules-based order “enshrined in frameworks such as the UN Convention on Law of the Sea”.

His words of reassurance were almost directly followed by those of James Henry Bergeron, political adviser to the Commander of Nato Allied Command, who admitted there “aren’t enough hulls anymore for the challenges we face”.

Senior naval personnel have appeared and spoke at several events this week, ostensibly to showcase their role in keeping maritime trade lanes open, but perhaps simply to be seen too.

The faces of some industry members have perhaps betrayed their true thoughts as they listen to those personnel: the jury on naval effectiveness in protecting shipping is still very much out.

It’s true that things aren’t as simple anymore as they were, say, in the Second World War, when merchant ships gathered in convoys to be shepherded across the frozen Arctic Ocean to supply Britain and the USSR with arms and food. As Bergeron pointed out, the capability to carry out precision strikes is now in the hands of pretty much anyone who can afford it, or at least anyone who has friends that can afford it.

Navies and shipping need to work out what each other want from the relationship. Do merchant ships want to sail in such close proximity to warships, which will surely be juicier targets for Houthi rebels, for example?

Working that out will not only be crucial to eventually reopening the Red Sea, but potentially keeping other routes open too.

Bergeron’s stark warning about the Cape of Good Hope being relatively easy to disrupt will send shivers down many a spine.

God only knows where ships will reroute to in that event.

Joshua Minchin
Senior reporter, Lloyd’s List

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1154855

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel