Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

More Chinese-linked vessels broadcast identity to transit Hormuz, but tankers stay away

  • Six China-linked vessels have transited Hormuz since March 1, broadcasting their Chinese identity — but none are tankers
  • The limited traffic does not confirm speculation of an Iranian safe passage deal for Chinese ships
  • Key Chinese owners and lessors remain on the sidelines, citing war risk insurance costs

More shipowners are testing whether a Chinese identity can buy safe passage through Hormuz — but China’s biggest players aren’t convinced yet

CHINESE-LINKED vessels are increasingly broadcasting their Chinese identity to transit the Strait of Hormuz, although the limited traffic so far falls well short of evidence that such ships have been granted safe passage by Iran.

Lloyd’s List Intelligence data shows that six China-linked vessels transited the critical chokepoint between March 1 and March 8, accounting for about 10% of all traffic. The most recent two — both supramax bulkers of around 53,000 dwt — crossed during the weekend: KSL Hengyang (IMO: 9333931) and Sino Ocean (IMO: 9222338).

Both vessels are either owned by Chinese shipowners or managed by Chinese shipmanagement companies. Like Iron Maiden (IMO: 9691149), whose transit late last week was widely reported, both broadcast “Chinese owner and crew” messages via AIS while passing through the strait. 

The three bulkers, along with another bulker and a general cargo carrier, were all sailing out of the Middle East Gulf. Only one vessel — the 37,833 dwt general cargo carrier with container capacity, Saraca (IMO: 9300764) — was heading into the MEG.

The identity broadcast tactic is not new. It has been used previously by vessels transiting the Bab el Mandeb Strait under threat from Houthi attacks. Lloyd’s List has also identified several Turkish-linked vessels broadcasting their owner’s nationality while transiting Hormuz, suggesting the practice is being used beyond Chinese operators.

However, no vessels with no verifiable connection to China have been found using this tactic to claim Chinese identity, as some market rumours have suggested.

The new cases suggest more shipowners and operators are beginning to leverage their Chinese identity to transit Hormuz — at least to exit the high-risk war zone — following Iran’s recent statements that its actions target only US- and Israeli-linked vessels.

 

 

But the limited volume of transits so far does not confirm market speculation that Chinese ships have been granted an Iranian exemption to enter the strait. Notably, none of the six vessels are tankers — the ship type most critical for carrying China’s energy supplies from the Middle East.

China’s largest shipowners and leasing companies have remained cautious thus far.

 

 

 

“Lessors will not allow owners or charterers to send vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. War risk insurance is either very difficult to obtain or prohibitively expensive,” said a shipping executive at a leasing company backed by a big Chinese state-owned bank. “Our vessels are now not even allowed to transit the Red Sea.”

Many Chinese leasing companies are nominal owners, with their vessels effectively controlled by borrowers under typical sale-and-leaseback arrangements. This means their assets could still be exposed to Iranian or Houthi attacks if operated by foreign shipowners or charterers — as has happened before, when vessels leased to foreign container carriers were targeted by Houthis in the Red Sea.

For now, the handful of transits represents a tentative test of the waters rather than a return to normal operations.

 

 

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Vessels
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1156556

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel