Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: Technical difficulties

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

   

JAPAN has added another tax-free carbon tax plan to the IMO pile.

States can now choose between adopting the Net-Zero Framework they approved a year ago, or two alternatives (the others by Liberia and Panama) which keep the paperwork, but remove the ‘economic element’, and with it any incentive for ships to actually go green.

A fourth option — kick the debate back into the long grass and keep the industry guessing — has been the IMO’s favoured tactic in the past and is a strong possibility this time too.

The US has long been clear it will oppose any carbon tax, so some countries are trying to find something they can agree on that looks like a green regulation without actually being one.

The technical-only plans wouldn’t reduce emissions but would create more uncertain compliance and fuel price risk. If one of them passes, it will be like another CII (Carbon Intensity Indicator), i.e. more pain for industry for no planetary benefit, and the same old arguments playing out at IMO every few years as part of the reviews.

A toothless IMO plan would give the EU the excuse to lock in the ETS and FuelEU schemes, and other countries the excuse to respond in kind.

Many countries, including China, are still hard at work on the design of the IMO Fund and reward schemes. That work would hardly be worth doing if they didn’t want such a scheme at all.

Brazil has argued it would be better to freeze the discussion and keep the bones of the NZF as a basis for future rules, rather than kill it outright and start from scratch.

The Liberia plan has not attracted much in the way of written support. Plans designed to lock shipping into LNG may look less attractive given the war in the Middle East and resulting gas supply shock.

Shipping is already seeing US foreign policy driving up bunker prices. For buyers of those fuels, greener alternatives could even start to look like a sensible price hedge.

It sounds crazy, but the level of support for the NZF could be higher than it looks. At MEPC84 — now only a month away, we’ll find out.

Declan Bush
Senior reporter, Lloyd’s List 

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1156735

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel