Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: Is it green enough?

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

   

BIOFUELS are usually dismissed as a short-term option on the journey to net zero, since there won’t be enough of them to go round.

Yet the unsexy work of classifying, certifying and verifying their various green credentials goes on at the IMO, where lobbyists increasingly talk up ethanol’s potential as ship fuel.

There are a few reasons to pay attention to the various barriers in the way of fuels such as ethanol and methanol, besides the obvious one.

Let’s imagine, for a moment, that the next MEPC meeting results in a global GHG emissions regulation being rejected, de-fanged or simply delayed again.

If the response is regional carbon taxes, as many predict it will be, then shipmanagement will become a matter of using different fuels depending on where in the world you are sailing.

Hydrogen-based e-fuels will never be viable without regulation, and could still struggle even with it. LNG is a fossil fuel, and is already incurring green taxes in the EU. Carbon capture is at best a long shot and at worst a scam.

That leaves biofuels, and the difficult questions about which ones are OK and which aren’t.

Certifying, verifying and crediting the right kinds of biofuels to avoid triggering deforestation will involve trade-offs. Yet without common standards to aim for, they will be difficult to make at scale.

There will be potential for fraud, environmental destruction and engine trouble. But there will also be opportunities to profit from regulatory arbitrage.

Regulations also have a way of falling into place once a fuel is known to be cheap and available.

The industry will have to take what green fuels it can get. But without common rules, the result will not be a clean transition so much as a new market in regulatory arbitrage.

Shipping’s fuel mix will be determined port by port and voyage by voyage, according to what is available, affordable and recognised by the regulator collecting the carbon bill. The winners will not necessarily be those offering the greenest fuel, but those able to prove their product is green enough, in the right market, at the right price.

That makes the obscure work of classification and certification commercially decisive. The fine print will determine which fuels scale, which investments pay off and who profits from the disruption.

Declan Bush
Senior reporter, Lloyd’s List 

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing.

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Companies
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1158429

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel