Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

The Daily View: Ports won’t save container shipping from the orderbook

Your latest edition of Lloyd’s List’s Daily View — the essential briefing on the stories shaping shipping

   

FOR the past two years, the container market has been preoccupied with one question: what happens when Red Sea disruption fades and the record orderbook starts hitting the water?

The conventional answer has been straightforward. More ships, shorter voyages through Suez and less capacity tied up around the Cape of Good Hope ultimately mean lower freight rates and weaker carrier earnings.

Recently, a competing argument has gained traction. As carriers begin returning to the Red Sea, some industry leaders increasingly contend that vessel supply is no longer the market’s binding constraint. The real problem, they argue, lies ashore, in congested ports, overstretched terminals and inland transport networks.

They are not wrong. But they may be overstating the extent to which congestion can offset a looming surge in supply.

Port congestion continues to absorb a meaningful share of the global containership fleet. Terminals across Asia, Europe and the Middle East remain under pressure and landside infrastructure investment continues to lag demand. Congestion is likely to remain a structural feature of container shipping for years to come.

What is less convincing is the suggestion that these bottlenecks can absorb all the capacity returning to the market.

For two years, virtually every major Asia-Europe service has been routed around the Cape of Good Hope, typically requiring several additional vessels to maintain weekly schedules. As services migrate back through Suez, many of those ships become surplus to requirements. Across roughly 40 weekly loops, the number returning to the market could be far above 100 vessels.

At the same time, the orderbook remains heavily skewed towards ultra-large tonnage. More 18,000-plus teu vessels are scheduled for delivery through 2027, creating not only direct pressure on Asia-Europe trades, but a cascading effect as displaced ships move into secondary east-west routes.

This matters because most major ports are already handling 24,000 teu vessels. Larger ships undoubtedly create sharper peaks in truck, rail and terminal demand, but they are not a new phenomenon. Congestion may worsen, yet it is unlikely to prevent a substantial increase in effective fleet capacity.

That does not mean rates will collapse overnight. Carriers have repeatedly demonstrated their ability to manage supply through blank sailings and network adjustments. Earnings are unlikely to fall off a cliff.

Richard Meade
Editor-in-chief, Lloyd’s List

Click here to view the latest Lloyd’s List Daily Briefing.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

LL1158510

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel