Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


Blame the executives, not ships, for lack of consolidation

The shipping industry is ripe for consolidation given its fragmented status.  Too bad that fleets of various companies may be compatible, but not the people who run them

HOW come an industry so fragmented, so transparent, and so homogeneous still resists consolidation? The answer lies on those running the companies. But shareholders may have a different point of view, and this time they are getting restless.

One of the underlying themes in this year’s Marine Money Week was “mergers and acquisitions”, a new-found term that seems to have replaced good old “consolidation”.

The shipping industry is no longer a newcomer in capital markets. Yet, despite almost 50 publicly traded international shipping companies on the two major exchanges in New York, only eight of them have current market capitalisations over $1bn.

Industry veteran Mark Friedman told a packed audience at Marine Money that a cocktail of low company valuations, lack of trading liquidity, below-investment grade credit ratings, and high debt leverage, has delegated shipping to a niche area among institutional investors, unlike other areas of the broader transportation sector like rail, trucking, airline, or even the cruise industry.

No real barriers exist to companies merging their shipping activities. Commercial and technical functions are scalable, debt is typically rolled over, and there exist no regulatory barriers, except perhaps in the container sector. 

The impetus to merge should be there given that the bar of getting financing, particularly equity financing, has gotten much higher.

Only company executives resist to acknowledge the obvious. 

Shipping may be a land of steady habits but times are changing, said Mr Friedman. Restless shareholders, many of whom come from the private equity sector, are agitating for change.

Will the industry listen?

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts