Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


Detained Iranian tanker’s crew face questions over cargo

The acting foreign minister of Spain — which claims the waters as its own and does not recognise British sovereignty — said Britain acted on the behest of the US and the country was assessing the detention’s legal implications

Inquisition of ship’s crew is likely to be the start of a protracted legal process about the legality of what was going on and whether Britain has rightful jurisdiction over the waters

A VERY large crude carrier said to be carrying sanctioned Iranian crude oil to Syria remains at anchor off Gibraltar as police and customs authorities interviewed the crew in connection with an alleged sanctions infringement.

A legal fight to keep the 1997-built Grace 1 from sailing is now expected, with Gibraltar having 72 hours from the arrest of the vessel in the early hours of July 4 to make applications to the Supreme Court to continue its detention.

British Royal Marines were involved in the operation using helicopters and speed boats to intercept the Panama-flagged tanker while the vessel was in British and Gibraltar territorial waters and waiting to take on supplies.

Lloyd’s List reported earlier this week that Grace 1 was heading for the British overseas territory after loading a 2m-barrel cargo in Iranian waters around mid-April, according to vessel-tracking data.

The tanker used the same strategies and tactics previously used by tankers shipping Iranian crude to China and Syria. Its Automatic Identifcation System was turned on and off to avoid detection of its location, cargo origin and destination.

The ship sailed around the Cape of Good Hope after loading around mid-April off Iran and spending time at anchor in two different locations in waters off the United Arab Emirates.

Gibraltar’s chief minister Fabian Picardo said the government had “reasonable grounds” to believe the tanker and its crude cargo had breached European Union sanctions against Syria. 

The crude was heading to the Banyas Refinery in Syria, he said, without expanding on how or why the government held this view or from where the intelligence came. That refinery is the property of an entity subject to European Union sanctions against Syria since 2014.

“The information was made available to the Gibraltar government and of course this has to be tested in judicial proceedings if there are any,” Mr Picardo said in an interview on the BBC.

He said the interception was made solely on the breach of European sanctions and information the cargo was destined for Syria, rather than any breach of unilateral US sanctions.

A team of about 20 marines, from 42 Commando, reportedly flew to the UK to Gibraltar at the request of the Gibraltar government and worked with 16 members from the Gibraltar police. A defence source described it as a “relatively benign operation” without major incident.

A British Foreign Office spokesman said: “We welcome this firm action by the Gibraltarian authorities, acting to enforce the EU Syria sanctions regime.”

The incident triggered debate over the lawfulness of the tanker seizure and detention, which will be tested in Gibraltar’s Supreme Court in the coming days.

Local maritime and admiralty lawyers have been instructed for the Captain of the Port, financial secretary and the attorney general, Lloyd’s List understands, ahead of what is expected to be a protracted legal debate.

US collusion allegations

The acting foreign minister of Spain — which claims the waters as its own and does not recognise British sovereignty — said Britain acted on the behest of the US and the country was assessing the detention’s legal implications.

The US has not shown the same vigilance for Iran-China crude flows, which have been taking place without action. Iranian- and Chinese- owned or controlled ships have been loading cargoes since the May 1 ending of waivers, allowing some countries limited imports. About five cargoes have been discharged in Syria.

Lloyd’s List understands that the owner of the very large crude carrier is Russian Titan Shipping, a subsidiary of Dubai-based oil and energy shipping company TNC Gulf, which has clear Iranian links.

While Grace 1 has a complex ownership chain, this is not unusual for many internationally trading vessels. Its executives listed on LinkedIn have Iranian university and technical qualifications, or list their names in Farsi, the Iranian language.

The ship’s current class and insurance is unknown according to databases. Lloyd’s Register withdrew class in January, 2019, as did former P&I insurers Swedish Club, at the same time as the vessel arrived to spend a month at the Bandar-e Taheri single buoy mooring area in Iranian waters, according to Lloyd’s List Intelligence data.

The ship’s opaque ownership and operating chain is complicated further by company websites linked to the tanker not operating.

The European Commission-operated Equasis website lists the shipmanager as Singapore-based Iships Management.

However, the website is under construction and its telephone number is not in service.

Websites for Russian Titan Shipping and TNC Gulf are also not working. LinkedIn lists Captain Asadpour as the executive managing director, saying he has also been president of the Georgia-based Russian Shipping Lines for 11 years.

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts