Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


Maersk’s green chief says methanol move is shipping’s ‘call to action’

‘We think that this is the best that we can do, and think others should also do the best that they can do’

Critics have questioned Maersk’s ability to supply enough green methanol to fuel its new carbon-neutral boxships

AP Moller-Maersk has called its big bet on carbon neutral methanol a “call to action” to the industry.

Responding to questions over the company’s ability to find enough renewable supply, its head of decarbonisation said Maersk was confident it could help ramp up global supplies of renewable biomass and electricity.

Morten Bo Christiansen told Lloyd’s List the industry had to “stop giving up” and to “start doing something”.

“We think there’s too much waiting and seeing,” he said. “We cannot sit and wait 10 years to hope that someone takes a bet on this and starts developing it.”

DNV, the classification society which supports LNG as shipping’s best transition fuel, has said that while it welcomed Maersk’s big bet, there was unlikely to be enough renewable methanol for it to be viable for the wider industry.

Green groups also welcomed Maersk’s ambition, but said supply would be the key problem. Nearly all the methanol made today is from gas or coal and so offers little climate benefit.

Mr Christiansen said the company hoped to create a “snowball effect” by signalling demand for the fuel to manufacturers.

“I think we as an industry need to take accountability for the emissions that we make, and they are massive,” he said. “We think this is the best that we can do, and actually think others should also do the best that they can do.”

Maersk earlier made headlines for rejecting liquefied natural gas power, which much of the shipping industry has embraced as the most viable transition fuel.

But LNG engines emit unburned methane, a far stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Pressure is growing for regulators to limit emissions of methane as a short-term measure to slow climate change.

Most major LNG backers declined to say whether Maersk’s methanol bet had caused them to reconsider.

But a source at a rival container line said there were worries their company had invested in a “first-generation Kindle”, referring to the Amazon e-book reader.

Methanol is used in ships on the water today, is easier to handle than rival fuels, is less toxic than ammonia if spilled, and does not need to be kept cold, as LNG does.

But it still emits carbon when burned, so all its inputs must be renewably sourced for the fuel to be truly green.

Maersk has said methanol from waste biomass will be cheaper in the next few years, but it hopes e-methanol, made from electricity, will become more cost-effective and easier to scale up as more renewable power is rolled out around the world.

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts