Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By


The Lloyd’s List Podcast: Yet another missed opportunity to decarbonise shipping

Listen to the latest edition of the Lloyd’s List’s weekly podcast — your free weekly briefing on the stories shaping shipping

The pre-COP26 optimism that climate politics may finally being starting to move at pace has ended in a depressingly predictable cop-out inside the IMO this week. This week’s podcast looks at what happened, what didn’t happen and why multilateral negotiations are necessarily slow to deliver results, even amid a climate emergency


The UN process does not deliver much, but it delivers some things — and while the minor verbal manoeuvring that emanated from the COP26 climate talks earlier this month failed on many measures, it did at least offer some hope of progress inside the International Maritime Organization. 

Sadly when it comes to eliminating hot air from the atmosphere, the Marine Environment Protection Committee is too often the source rather than the solution.

Wherever you stand on the climate debate, this week’s discussions have been disappointing.

Ambitious states, such as vulnerable Pacific islands and the EU27, called for concrete action.

Less ambitious ones such as China, Russia and Saudi Arabia lined up to block such action at every turn, repeating the same arguments relating to cost and fairness to developing countries, day after day, seemingly regardless of topic.

The frustrations of diplomacy via Zoom are dragging on a process that was pretty glacial even before the restrictions of the global lockdowns. Procedural spats and complaints about the transparency of social media are somehow even more undignified on a screen than they were in person.

But this is not just process or petty complaints about media coverage. Fundamental difference regarding climate finance and political positions have created a visible schism in the dialogue and it is hard to see how that gap will be bridged any time soon.

To try to help us make sense of it and dissect a lack of progress inside the MEPC this week, we have drafted in some expertise from inside the MEPC.

  • Damien Chevallier, the alternate permanent representative to the International Maritime Organization Maritime and attaché to the French Embassy in the UK

  • Christina Dixon, ocean lead at the non-governmental organisation Environmental Investigation Agency

  • Isabelle Rojon, principal consultant at maritime consultancy UMAS International, where her work focuses on maritime climate policies and governance

  • Guy Platten, secretary-general of the International Chamber of Shipping 

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts