Lloyd's List is part of Maritime Intelligence

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited, registered in England and Wales with company number 13831625 and address c/o Hackwood Secretaries Limited, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, United Kingdom. Lloyd’s List Intelligence is a trading name of Maritime Insights & Intelligence Limited. Lloyd’s is the registered trademark of the Society Incorporated by the Lloyd’s Act 1871 by the name of Lloyd’s.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call UK support at +44 (0)20 3377 3996 / APAC support at +65 6508 2430

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Maersk Red Sea halt prompts more Cape diversions

Lloyd’s List Intelligence data shows that several ships operated by Maersk have changed course to head south, even though they originally planned to navigate the shorter Suez Canal route

Many more originally Suez Canal-bound ships are now marked ‘to be announced’, with 54 such vessels still to confirm their course at this stage compared with 25 in the carrier’s January 1 update

SEVERAL Maersk containerships originally planned to traverse the Suez Canal have been diverted around the Cape of Good Hope, following the company’s second suspension of Red Sea operations.

The decision to halt transits was announced on January 2 after the 15,266 teu Maersk Hangzhou (IMO: 9784300) was attacked by Houthi militants in the region.

Lloyd’s List Intelligence’s vessel-tracking data shows that a few ships operated by the Danish carrier have turned their bows southward, despite previously being on the shorter route via the Egypt-controlled canal. 

The 19,630 teu westbound Manila Maersk (IMO: 9780469) changed course around 2100 hrs GMT on January 2 near Sri Lanka. The other two were the 7,060 teu Clifford Maersk (IMO: 9198575) and 8,450 teu Maersk Sydney (IMO: 9289958) heading to the region from the US east coast. They changed direction in the North Atlantic yesterday and the day before.

These three are part of 175 vessels covered in Maersk’s updated diversion schedule published on January 3.

Additionally, the status of two more ships — the 15,226 teu Maersk Havana (IMO: 9784336) and 15,282 teu Maersk Horsburgh (IMO: 9784269) — has also changed from “continue via Suez Canal” to “diverted via Cape of Good Hope”. They were located off South Korea’s Busan and Singapore, respectively.

Many more originally canal-bound ships are now marked as “to be announced”, with 54 such vessels compared with 25 in the January 1 update.

 

 

Several ships have also had their status shift from TBA to sailing around Africa. For example, the 18,340 teu Mathilde Maersk (IMO: 9632179) made a U-turn near Greece after entering the Mediterranean from the Netherlands, and is now heading for the Strait of Gibraltar at 20 knots.

Maersk was the first carrier to announce readiness to resume operations on the Red Sea after its initial pause on December 15. But the attack on Maersk Hangzhou disrupted plans, despite the US and its allies starting to provide naval escorts in the area.

The route disruption has sharply driven up freight rates. CMA CGM announced its Asia-Mediterranean rates for Freight All Kinds will rise to $3,500-3,650 per teu or $6,000-6,300 per feu from January 15.

Meanwhile, the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index released last Friday showed spot rates to main ports in Europe and the Mediterranean jumped 80% and 70%, respectively, over the previous week to $2,694 and $3,491 per teu.

 

Related Content

Topics

  • Related Vessels
  • Related Companies
  • Related Places
  • UsernamePublicRestriction

    Register

    LL1147818

    Ask The Analyst

    Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
    Ask The Analyst

    Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

    All fields are required.

    Please make sure all fields are completed.

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please make sure you have filled out all fields

    Please enter a valid e-mail address

    Please enter a valid Phone Number

    Ask your question to our analysts

    Cancel